Competency Assessment: (CU3 M2)
In a four-page Microsoft Word Docx or rtf file format document, please respond to the following FOUR situations. Be thorough and complete in your responses. Use references to support your position and cite them appropriately:
1. Imagine a woman who suffers from dementia and lives in an assisted living facility. One day, she wanders into another resident’s room and picks up an antique vase from the other resident’s bureau. As she holds the vase, she forgets that it belongs to someone else and walks out of the room with it. Later, she places it on her own nightstand, where she admires it greatly. Has there been a crime here? Why or why not?
2. What should be the goal of penalties or punishments for criminal offenses? Compare and contrast how our criminal justice system would differ if the goal of punishment was each of the following: retribution, rehabilitation, protection of society, or deterrence from future acts of crime.
3. What should be the goal of penalties or punishments for criminal offenses? Compare and contrast how our criminal justice system would differ if the goal of punishment was each of the following: retribution, rehabilitation, protection of society, or deterrence from future acts of crime.
4. In detail, address the learning outcomes for this Module:
Compare and contrast misdemeanors and felonies, and identify examples of each.
Identify criminal acts related to the business world.
- Define and discuss white collar crime.
Your response should be typed, double-spaced in a standard-sized document (8.5" x 11") with 1" margins on all sides. You should use a clear font that is highly readable. APA recommends using 12 pt. Times New Roman font. Citations should be in APA format.
Points
Due | For | Available from | Until |
---|---|---|---|
N/A | Everyone | N/A | N/A |
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 pts = Author thoroughly understands Burden of Proof and applies concepts to the scenario presented with great detail. Author offers additional information about Burden of Proof to support position. 3 pts = Author evaluates Burden of Proof and loosely applies concepts to the situation presented. 2 pts = Author explains Burden of Proof but fails to fully connect to the scenarios presented. 1 pt = Author mentions Burden of Proof but fails to connect to the scenario presented. 0 pts = Insufficient |
| 4.0 pts | |||||
4 pts = Author thoroughly describes Penalties in the US criminal justice system and relates to situation presented. Author offers additional examples. 3 pts = Author addresses Penalties in the US criminal justice system and relates to example 2 pts = Author shows signs of understanding Penalties in the US criminal justice system and relates to example. 1 pt = Author does not understand Penalties in the US criminal justice system 0 pts = Insufficient |
| 4.0 pts | |||||
4 pts = Author synthesizes knowledge and discusses White Collar Crimes, Types of Crimes in the business world. . Author is thorough. 3 pts = Author understands White Collar Crimes, Types of Crimes in the business world and relates with examples. Author connects position to example given. 2 pts = Author loosely evaluates White Collar Crimes, Types of Crimes in the business world and relates to example. 1 pt = Author does not understand White Collar Crimes, Types of Crimes in the business world 0 pts = Insufficient |
| 4.0 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Outcome 03: Understand the requirements for a valid contract and apply those requirements to specific contractual activities. threshold: 3.0 pts |
| -- | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Outcome 04: Recognize the interconnectedness of the legal system to business, society and the environment. threshold: 3.0 pts |
| -- | |||||
Total Points: 12.0 |